
|
|
|
|
|
FYI: PreparedSociety.com - International Survival and Homesteading Forum Community. Everything related to Preparedness from Survival to Homesteading plus Gallery, Groups and Links. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thinking of moving to a rural remote location? Then read this first! Learn what you need to consider before you buy your land and homestead! |
|
|
|
June 15, 2010 Newsletter |
|
|
|
|
|
Events Reaching Conclusions? |
|
|
|
I know I've said before or implied in other posts that world events appear to be reaching their conclusions. Many national economies seem to be going under; the US seems to be headed for more war; the Gulf of Mexico appears to be "America's Chernobyl"; ObamaCare will be a nightmare especially for seniors...earthquakes, tsunamis, Icelandic volcanoes, and as a neighbor said recently with the "Gulf Oil Spill" that it seemed like the end times with oceans of blood--from all the dead marine life--as prophesied in Revelation. I still think, "the time is not yet," to use the phrase that Christ used. But still... |
|
|
|
Until someone who has witnessed any sort of planning by any conspirators from BP or Halliburton or the US government or some other agent conspirators and has the proof, there is no reason for me to believe Gulf "spill" incident happened or was allowed to happen for any other reason than it was due to lack of oversight, sheer incompetence, and nature taking its course. Further I think this oil spill can be contained or even eliminated--several years ago I read about organisms that can eat oil slicks, but I can't find the link (yet the other evening Mark Levin mentioned such organisms on his radio show)--but that no one wants this to happen, either because as my hubby says Obama and Co. want to bring down the oil industry or because no one wants to solve problems anymore. Rahm Emmanuel said it: "Never let a good crisis go to waste." After all, the US government refused international help to stop this leaking. Why help the environment when a sick environment is necessary to carry out the evil plans of oligarchs and bankers (or insert any Satanic force here...). All those shrimpers and fishermen are just collateral damage to the soulless psychopaths whom Satan, the prince of this world with God's permission (see Job Chapter 2 about how Satan needs God's permission to do anything), has taken control of, and all the dead and dying sea life are just convenient "victims" to these black-hearted creatures. But that's okay...they've cloned sheep, they are creating factory farm animals (according to Matthew Scully, author of "Dominion: The Cruelty of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call To Mercy") who will not feel pain when they become "downer cows" or have their offspring ripped from them in "gestation crates." Maybe they can really play god and repopulate the seas with fish and sea creatures who can live in the worst pollution known to man. Then they can re-create humanity which can eat this trash! More likely is that someone knew what would happen when nature takes its course, and had to cover his own butt; therefore, the buck gets passed and Mr. Big O is very good at letting the buck pass. Another reason I don't think the culprits carried this out according to some sick conspiracy is because there is only so much in nature that these inbred idiots can control. Partly, the nature of the sea bed these oil wells have been drilled into is in a state of geologic physical flux, plus equipment wears out, chemical reactions, entropy... And the fact that events like this are never prepared for. Yet, if there is some conspiracy to stop the flow of oil--Norway has stopped all drilling projects planned for the North Sea (which means Norway's economy, which has been booming, will likely contract)--in order for billions of people to lack energy and be at the mercy of the conspirators and thus some sort of kill-off or die-off scenario is allowed to happen, I'd like to know what these conspirators think they will get out of it. Now these folks don't believe in God--but aren't they aware of age old wisdom: "what goes around comes around"? One can say, "Well, Deb, it hasn't come around for them in six thousand years...what makes you think it will now?" To which I could say, "What makes you think the elites of six thousand years ago are the same as today's elites?" I mean, were the Rothschilds around six millennia ago? |
|
|
|
Another sign that events are reaching their conclusions is that the US mainstream media (as well as US government functionaries of all kind) may rightly now be called the western world's most UN-free...not North Korea "un-free," but western world un-free. It is hard enough for the mainstream media to say anything negative about the Obama Administration. This is a matter of course when the Democrats are in power, yet it doesn't get a whole lot freer when the Republicans are in power, either. But what makes the US MSM the most un-free in the west is that it is ABSOLUTELY FORBIDDEN IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM TO CRITICIZE ISRAEL. PERIOD! END OF STORY! If you criticize Israel you will NOT get elected (Ron Paul excepted...there is always an exception that proves the rule), or you will NOT be re-elected. That's what happened to Cynthia McKinney...she got kicked out of the House o' Representin' because she criticized Israel, not because she opposed the war. That is why Rand Paul, going against what his father believes, refuses to criticize Israel even if he really believes more like his dad, Ron. That is why Sarah Palin has that famous photo with the Israeli flag on the wilndowsill of her governor's office in Juneau. That is why Rep. Peter King keeps acting as if he's got Netanyahu's dick up his ass (sorry for the inflammatory language). That is why Obama keeps paying lip service to the Palestinian people's desire to be treated like human beings instead of animals, yet when Netanyahu says, "Jump!" Obama ALWAYS says, "How High?" And that is why every MSM reporter, pundit, and analyst has cheered for the resignation of Helen Thomas, who DARED criticize Israel (and the fact that she's an Arab-American only made it easier to do--mustn't cut "those people" any slack, must we? And just hearing Debbie Schlussel's disgusting nonsense about the "terrorist" leanings of the Arab-American Miss America on the Mike Church show a few weeks ago still makes me want to puke!) For shame, Ms.Thomas! Why should they treat Palestinians like humans when Israel is only "defending itself" against animals and /or terrorists? Wouldn't you, Ms. Thomas, defend yourself from an animal or a terrorist? How could you DARE consider the Palestinian people human or NOT terrorist?! And not only this: If you remember in the MSM June 8, 1967, the day Israel sank the USS Liberty, then you get fired or censured. But if you criticize Helen Thomas like that lackey Johathan Stewart of the Daily Show, you get applauded. I actually envision a day when the government passes a law stating that anyone, MSM or not, who criticizes Israel, will be jailed and deported, for any sort of criticism, such as criticizing their persecution of Christians. (Of course, then Barack "I can kill Americans with impunity" Obama will have to oder the assassinations of all USS Liberty survivors.) For proof of this--as if you actually need further proof, but since I might be sued for this post I migfht as well provide as much proof as I can: Robert Scheer (who I believe is Jewish, but I might be wrong), got fired from the San Fransisco Chronicle for criticizing Israel. Folks, for exposing Israel's persecution of Christians and their putrid heresy in the Talmud regarding Jesus Christ, I would gladly go to jail--you heard it here first. (But you can read more about that in my Bible blog. Suffice it to say that since Israel's attack on the Gaza Flotilla, I have not even considered listening to anyone on right wing talk radio. All of them, even Andrew Wilkow, supports Israel's killing of the 19-year-old Turkish-American teenager Furkan (Mike Church, in not wanting to piss off his Tea Party friends, is simply not talking about it...in fact, he barely ever even mentions Israel on his show since he has eschewed being a neo-con. The man is clearly playing it safe. Would the Founding Fathers play it safe, Mr.Church?). Basically, Wilkow and the others are allowing Israel to get away with murder and the entire left or right wing MSM is doing the same thing. And it seems only Gordon Duff is calling them out for it. |
|
|
|
So, while my heart breaks that a nation I had always admired until recently, Israel, is engaging in these wantonly evil acts, instead of conjuring up all sorts of spiritual or "conspiracy theory" reasons thus setting myself up to get sued by the ADL or put on some enemies list by the SPLC just for speaking the truth, first I will let three Israelis, Gilad Atzmon, in an amazing article (see also here), Ran HaCohen, who writes for Antiwar.com, and Ilan Pappe, explain what is going on in Israel now that has led their government to do the unconscionable in killing members of a peaceful set of boats in international waters sponsored by a friendly government, Turkey, bound for Gaza. Plus you can Google "Uri Avnery," former Jewish member of the Knesset. Or, you can view the video below featuring Holocaust survivor Dr. Hanj Meyer in which he compares his ordeal under the Nazis with the ordeal of the Palestinians, with a warning about what this is doing to Jewry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, I wouldn't even be bringing this up had Israel done what Israel always does in these situations: surround the boats, force the boats into some Israeli port promising to deliver the goods to Gaza but confiscting everything instead and keeping everything for themselves, then holding the folks on the boats for 24 to 48 hours, then releasing them to their home countries. Because these boats never actually get to Gaza and barely ever really help the Palestinians there I was thinking that this is just another dog and pony show, trying to give Israel bad PR (folks, it doesn't take much nowadays to get Israel bad PR!). Further, Israel DID warn these boats not to come anywheres near Israel or Gaza. Further, unless anyone on these boats was just plain living in denial, every single one of these folks KNEW Israel would do something against them. They had to know! Yet, they took the voyage anyway, and so they must take responsibility for knowing what could happen and not pretend that they would be "innocent victims" (they are victims, but not exactly innocent ones if you know what I mean). So, this is why I am bringing this up: Israel didn't do what it usually does--it attacked the boats and murdered nine people, including a Turkish-American teenager born in the USA, as well as to heavily injure several others. And then, it created phony videos for the benefit of their own audience and the gullible-as-usual American audiences of FOX News, CNN, and the rest, vidoes which the IDF has now claimed were phony! But don't expect FOX and the rest of the MSM to repeat the IDF's claims that the videos were faked by the IDF (and have been claimed as phony by the Israeli govt. as well). Further, even if FOX and the rest did admit that the vidoes were phony, I would expect about 50 percent of Americans to ignore that and still blame the victims for the violence. I have pretty much given up hope that at least a slim majority of Americans will ever seek the truth in all things, and will have to applaud the gorwing minority that at least is attempting to seek the truth. As for Christian Zionists, I'm going to have to leave shaking them into the truth up to God, Who clearly has them under "strong delusion" (II Thessalonians 2:8-11). The IDF has also retracted its own reports claiming that the folks on the boats were "al Qaida." See also hereBut don't expect the US MSM to mention this. Now, if you think I'm making up the "videos are phony" claim, Duff recently put up absolute, indisputable evidence that the videos were created in some Israeli film studio or other using real footage taken from Mavi Marmara passengers, and explains how they could have done it. All the proof I needed was when a "ghost passenger" walks through metal! Methinks Israel's slip is showing! And even if you believe Israel STILL had the right to do what they did, why in the world did they fake videos? If Israel is righteous, what are they trying to hide? |
|
|
|
But my take isn't simply that Israel had no right to attack these boats in international waters and do what they did.. In fact if these flotilla boats had real honest-to-God terrorists, I would be thrilled that the boats were stopped (but not the killings, regardless). My take, that BOTH Israel and Hamas are wrong, period, and that between the two neither side should be supported, while wishing for harmony between ordinary Jews and Palestinians and an end to persecution for Jewish and Palestinian Christians there (by BOTH Talmudic Jews and Muslims), is based on the following: One, Israel created Hamas. See here and here. In a nutshell, Israel created Hamas to counterbalance Fatah ( Arafat) as well as to sabotage the Oslo Peace Accords. When its leader Shiek Yassin was put in prison (it doesn't say by whom but I assume Israel) for 12 years, the Israeli government let him out after a year so that he could begin the 1987 Intafada. He was put in prison again for life, but in 1997, Israel released him again. Who was Israel's Prime Minister at the time? Netanyahu! What can be deduced from this? More than anything else, it can be deduced that even today Hamas, called "terrorist" by the Isreali government, is in fact working WITH the Israeli government, that Israel, in blockading Gaza, is not punishing Hamas, but the Palestinian people at large, and finally, that the bombings and invasions of Gaza are one big dog and pony show designed specifically to ethnically cleanse Gaza, if genocide is too inconvenient. Why do you think Egypt has been allowed by Israel to end it's part of the blockade at the Rafah crossing? And we were all thinking Mubarak has become a "savior" to the Palestinians! (And kuddos to Israeli-Canadian Barry Chamish for being the first person I am aware of to report this, in his book, "Who Killed Yitzak Rabin?") Two, the blockade of Gaza, recently reported by an Israeli "Palestinian rights" group Gisha from a FOIA type request from the Knesset, states that the reasons are economic, not security. "Sari Bashi, the director of Gisha (which sued the govt. for information--DL), said the documents prove that Israel isn't imposing its blockade for its stated reasons--security, but rather as collective punishment for the Palestinian population of Gaza." Three, if this is true, then why did Israel invade Gaza last December and January under the pretext of stopping Qassam rockets from Hamas into Sderot and Ashkelon? Unless--since they work with Hamas after all--they used Hamas in false flag ops against Israel in order to kill as many Palestinians as they could get away with? If they can't do genocide, then ethnic cleansing will do (which is why "settlers" are being allowed to steal Palestinian property in the West Bank, to ethnically cleanse that area). To conclude here: BOTH sides are wrong because BOTH sides are creating a population immersed in misery, which, because apparently Israel gets to tell the rest of the world how to behave, the rest of the world really couldn't care less about. It is the lack of humanity, mercy, and goodness, on Israel's--and the rest of the world's--part, that makes me sick and makes me write this diatribe against a nation I would rather support...but right now I can't. |
|
|
|
Finally, events are reaching their conclusions here in the good ol' USA. It is one thing for the MSM to denounce Helen Thomas for criticizing Israel. It is even more over the top for most of the MSM to call Tea Party folks and anyone else who criticizes the US government and the oligarchs who control it "Nazis"! The other night, a guy like Chris Matthews called a person like yours truly a "Nazi"! If I had the money I'd sue the bastard! There are three things I will NOT allow myself to be called: anti-Semitic, racist, or Nazi. (When my own husband called me anti-Semitic because I was not sufficiently obsequious to Israel I flat out told him: "I grew up with Jews, some of my best friends were Jews, and don't you ever call me anti-Semitic again!" And he hasn't. That is why I put up on my Bible blog a "legal notice" that anyone who calls me anti-Semitic WILL be sued in a local court in the state of Texas! Further, I will NOT accept anonymous e-mails calling me anti-Semitic, or legal threats of same. First of all, they'd have to prove that Arabs aren't Semites, and, if the accuser is Jewish, they'd have to prove that they really are Semitic. Arthur Koestler's "Thirteenth Tribe" lays out a credible argument that Ashkenazi or "Eastern" Jews are not Semities but converted Khazars or someone else (making them Japhetic, not Semitic. Megaphonies: be warned.). Yours truly does NOT completely buy that argument. Assyria did disperse all the Ten Tribes of Isreal to God knows where after they conquered the northern tribes, Israel, in 721 BC. So who is to say all Ashkenazi Jews are Khazars? Plus, Israeli historian Shlomo Sand makes a similar argument, that Ashkenazi Jews are not ethnically Semites, while the Palestinians are.) |
|
|
|
Thus it appears the MSM is fighting for the end of the First Amendment and wants criticism of the federal government outlawed. That is, until the Republicans take over again! Thus, the rule of law, which this country--as the first country ever--was founded upon, is pretty much over. When the Supreme Court can make the law, as opposed to what it was constitutinally designed to do, which is interpret the law in its original meaning as per the Founding Fathers, and say it's okay to have abortions because God forbid God should do what He is designed to do, control life since He created life! And heaven forbid the Supremes should discern what the Fourteeth Amendment actually means (despite the fact that there is a question as to whether it was properly ratified), and claim this year that Corporations "as persons" can buy political condidates, or even become candidates, for office. But don't forget there is a "prescedent" for this--Henry "Scoop" Jackson, aka the "Senator from Boeing". When ObamaCare--which over 65 percent of Americans oppose, and which the entire Republican Party in both houses opposed--can be passed "so we can see what's in the bill," or "so we can add this or that later," or so some Nebraska Senator can get all his constitutents' medical care paid for by the rest of us taxpayers, is this the United States? Or Haiti? Or Honduras? Or the Philippines? Or Burkina Faso? Or any other "banana republic"? Yeah, I know, I'm starting to sound like Glenn Beck... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blog Roll
Survival and Rural Remote Resources
Political, Cultural and Social Issues
Economics Issues
Bible Issues
This website was created
by West Texas Research
and updated regularly.
Problems? Contact the webmaster
Copyright 2007 Deborah Lagarde.
All rights reserved.